METHODOLOGY
Inspired by peer-reviewed science.
3 peer-reviewed instruments + 9 proprietary FLOW XP instruments = 12 total. Bibliography for transparency. Independent implementation informed by this body of work.
Important — intellectual property
Proprietary FLOW XP implementation, inspired by peer-reviewed research. Third-party frameworks remain their authors' property — FLOW XP does not redistribute or commercially exploit them. Our algorithms, architecture, AI, and platform = FLOW XP BV (BE 0669.982.661) property. SynC, Drive, Climate, Mirror, Squad, Compass, Pulse, Onboard, and 1on1 are proprietary FLOW XP de novo instruments. SynC is consistent with public emotional intelligence frameworks (Salovey & Mayer 1990, Gross 1998, Niven et al. 2009).
Reference bibliography
PCDEQ-2
Inspires the FLOW XP Edge instrument
Psychological Characteristics of Developing Excellence Questionnaire — version 2
Hill, A., MacNamara, Á., & Collins, D. (2015)
Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology
View reference on Google Scholar →What this reference work studies
Validated questionnaire operationalising the Psychological Characteristics of Developing Excellence (PCDEs) framework: commitment, focus and distraction control, quality practice, evaluation of performance, coping under pressure, social skills, planning, self-belief. Integrates the healthy/toxic perfectionism distinction (Stoeber 2006) as an embedded conceptual layer.
ACSI-28
Inspires the FLOW XP Grit instrument
Athletic Coping Skills Inventory
Smith, R. E., Schutz, R. W., Smoll, F. L., & Ptacek, J. T. (1995)
Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology
View reference on Google Scholar →What this reference work studies
Psychological coping skills in sport: coping with adversity, peaking under pressure, goal setting, concentration, freedom from worry, confidence, coachability.
CART-Q
Inspires the FLOW XP Alliance instrument
Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (3C+1)
Jowett, S., & Ntoumanis, N. (2004)
Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
View reference on Google Scholar →What this reference work studies
Quality of the coach-athlete relationship across four dimensions: Closeness, Commitment, Complementarity, and Co-orientation.
FLOW XP proprietary instruments
Nine proprietary FLOW XP de novo instruments, all authored by FLOW XP. No items derived from third-party proprietary instruments. Scoring algorithms, dimension architecture, AI report generation, and platform interface remain the exclusive intellectual property of FLOW XP BV (BE 0669.982.661).
Punctual instruments — 1 per month, distributed over the season
SynC — Coach emotional and relational intelligence
Coach self-assessment. 7 dimensions: Confidence, Engagement, Cooperation, Empathy, Emotional Perception, Self-Regulation, Interpersonal Regulation. 56 items · ~14 min · 2×/season (September + April). Elite tier only. Consistent with Salovey & Mayer (1990), Gross (1998), Niven, Totterdell & Holman (2009). Crossed with athletes' Alliance perception via the Co-orientation Algorithm (Blind Spot Alerts when gap > 25 points).
Drive — Athlete self-determination and motivation
Athlete-facing assessment of motivational quality along the self-determination continuum (intrinsic → controlled → amotivation). 60 items · ~15 min · 1×/season (October). Consistent with Self-Determination Theory (Deci & Ryan). Pro + Elite tiers.
Climate — Motivational climate created by the coach
Coach self-assessment of the motivational environment they create: empowering (autonomy-supportive) vs disempowering (controlling). 56 items · ~14 min · 1×/season (November). Elite tier only. Consistent with SDT and motivational climate research.
Mirror — Anonymous 360° coach review
Athletes rate their perception of the coach's behaviours — anonymously and only when k≥5 responses are collected to prevent identification. 60 items · ~15 min · 1×/season (March). Elite tier only. Consistent with coach behaviour research.
Squad — Team cohesion and psychological safety
Team-level assessment combining cohesion, collective efficacy, and psychological safety dimensions. Includes anonymous sociometric items. 38 items + sociometric · ~10 min · 1×/season (January). Performance + Pro + Elite tiers. Consistent with Carron, Edmondson, and Vallerand.
Compass — Achievement orientation and goal structure
Athlete-facing assessment of achievement goal orientation: task-mastery vs ego-normative. Maps the athlete's underlying motivational compass. 60 items · ~15 min · 1×/season (May). Pro + Elite tiers. Consistent with Achievement Goal Theory.
Continuous instrument — daily throughout the season
Pulse — Daily high-frequency microsurvey
Daily opt-in microsurvey. 4 adaptive sliders that change context based on day type: training day, match day (pre-competition), match day+1 (recovery), or rest day. <30 seconds. Habit-forming, not pressure-inducing. Pro + Elite tiers.
Event-based instruments — triggered by specific moments
Onboard — First Mirror (athlete onboarding profile)
Psychometric and projective baseline for newly signed athletes. 4 dimensions: coach expectations, team expectations, season intent, self-signature. 11 items · 4-5 min. Trigger: first app connection after contract signature. Creates longitudinal hooks with all subsequent instruments across the season. All tiers.
1on1 — Mid-season individual meeting preparation
Athlete preparation form structured around the KISS matrix (Keep, Improve, Start, Stop). 6 items · 5 min. Trigger: 48h before the scheduled individual meeting with the head coach. Transforms the meeting into a structured development lever. Elite tier only.
All nine proprietary instruments use a Likert 1-6 scale, include trap items for response quality detection, and feed the FLOW XP AI report generation engine through a validated schema.
Scope of this page
Scientific transparency page. FLOW XP claims no rights over third-party reference works listed. No third-party instrument reproduced or commercially exploited. Rights questions: admin@flowxp.eu.